wayland-protocols scope and governance

[Simon Ser]

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 4:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been following along on this thread, and I really appreciate that you've reached out to me.
>
> The current document seems reasonable to me. It will be a positive for the ecosystem to have a clearly-defined method of proposing and stabilizing new protocols for adoption.

Nice! Would you agree to send a Acked-by for this patch?

> I'm not quite as active in the Wayland space as I have been historically, but EFL/Enlightenment does have interest in joining this community and I'm still probably the best point of contact at this time.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> PS. The email address you used for Derek is no longer active (it hasn't been for years) and you should likely check with him on IRC for a more up-to-date address and/or interest.

Side note, I tried contacting Derek on IRC and he said he's not
interested in becoming a point-of-contact. So I guess you'd be the
only point-of-contact for EFL/Enlightenment.

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:17 AM Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr> wrote:
>
> > [Cc'ing more people]
> >
> > > > Points of contact I had in mind:
> > > >
> > > > - KWin: Roman Gilg <subdiff at gmail.com>
> > > > - Mutter: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl at gmail.com>
> > > > - Weston: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen at collabora.com>,
> > > >   Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>
> > > > - wlroots: Drew DeVault <sir at cmpwn.com>, Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr>
> > > >
> > > > I think it would make sense to include this initial list in a MEMBERS
> > > > file in the upcoming wayland-protocols patch series that adds this
> > > > governance document.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Sounds good to me!
> > >
> > > Prodding toolkit projects for people would be good, and also
> > > Enlightenment.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've been discussing for a while about wayland-protocols governance. You can
> > find the latest proposal at [1].
> >
> > We're discussing about the initial list of members. Would Enlightenment, Qt and
> > GTK be interested in being initial members as well?
> >
> > Feedback is welcome. Thanks,
> >
> > [1]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2019-October/040919.html
> >
> > Simon