multiple wl surfaces commit in one client

[zou lan]

Hi Simon & Jonas

May I ask if
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/26#note_554405
only
include the patch of protocol xml file
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/26/diffs?commit_id=108ab3ef2c9e028e6159793e6c4cae6ed9c7a546,
there is no weston implementation patch for transactions-unstable-v1.xml,
right?

Thank you!

Best Regards
Nancy


Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr> 于2020年11月6日周五 下午5:39写道：

> On Friday, November 6, 2020 10:38 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jadahl at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:51:26AM +0000, Simon Ser wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > On Friday, November 6, 2020 3:14 AM, zou lan nancy.lan.zou at gmail.com
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Simon & pekka
> > > > Thank you for your reply!
> > > >
> > > > > > The OS could pre-empt the client after
> > > > > > the first wl_surface_commit is flushed on the wire and before the
> > > > > > second one is.
> > > >
> > > > I want to ask if after first wl_surface_commit, but I don't call
> > > > wl_display_flush/wl_display_dispatch, is the first wl_surface_commit
> > > > flushed to server because  out buffer of the connection is full?
> > >
> > > That is correct.
> > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/wayland-project/wayland/blob/master/src/connection.c,
> > > > can we increase the buffer size in this structure wl_buffer to reduce
> > > > the possibility of this?
> > >
> > > I'd rather not. This would not fix the issue, and it's unclear if it'd
> > > really help.
> > >
> > > > By the way, for the WIP protocol,
> > > >
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/jadahl/wayland-protocols/-/blob/wip/transactions/unstable/transactions/transactions-unstable-v1.xml
> ,
> > > > do we have any patchset in weston to implement it? I don't find it in
> > > > weston master branch.
> > >
> > > I'm not aware of any Weston implementation as of yet. As you can see,
> > > the protocol hasn't yet been merged in wayland-protocols. Writing a new
> > > implementation would certainly help getting the protocol merged.
> >
> > weston, mutter and gtk implementations are linked to from this comment:
> >
> >
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/26#note_554405
>
> Damn, I completely missed that. Thanks for the heads-up!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20201108/70443767/attachment.htm>