[Xcb] SVN: any intense objections to switching?
Jeremy Kolb
jkolb at brandeis.edu
Fri Aug 5 02:30:14 EST 2005
Barton C Massey wrote:
> In message <1122994125.8088.7.camel at localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
>>Is it possible to go backwards? We don't want a source code motel where
>>which we can check in to but not check out of ;-).
>
>
> Good point. I thought I'd checked this, but I can't find my
> old notes around anymore. It looks like this might do the
> job:
> http://svn2cvs.tigris.org/
> Someone should experiment with it a bit.
>
>
>>I'd also recommend frequent tarball generation so that you don't
>>discourage people putting their toes in the water with Xcb; most
>>everyone knows how to check out of CVS; the same is not true of SVN.
>
>
> Maybe. SVN co is really not that hard to figure out; it
> essentially is just like CVS, except with URLs instead of
> the magic CVS -d strings and the whole "login" fiasco.
>
>
> Thanks for the great thoughts!
>
> Bart
> _______________________________________________
> xcb mailing list
> xcb at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb
I just got home from a week long campout and haven't read beyond this
message yet so I apologize if other stuff is written about this later.
I've had no problems with cvs so far, and I don't know what the cost of
moving is, but it is nice to be under fdo in regards to source control,
and I find cvs easy to use. I don't mind the logins and as far as the
-d strings it should be fine once you create your local repository, then
you never have to deal with them. Anyways, I'll keep reading.
Jeremy
More information about the xcb
mailing list