[Xcb] Re: [Xcb-commit] xcb-demo/tests lissajoux.c,1.6,1.7

[Vincent Torri]

but the improvements are not significative. only 100 frames more displayed
when one uses shm (with ~3000 frames), which is not big, imho. Did I make
something wrong in the algorithm ?

btw, evas with xcb was using shm since one year ;)

Vincent

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Jamey Sharp wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 07:51:24AM +0000, Bart Massey wrote:
> > Fixed bad bug in test_shm() ---"data" parameter needed to be passed
> > by address.  Shared memory case works now.
>
> Yay Bart! We have a working XCB+MIT-SHM demo now: That's awesome!
>
> --Jamey
>