[Xcb] Re: [Xcb-commit] xcb-demo/tests lissajoux.c,1.6,1.7

Barton C Massey bart at cs.pdx.edu
Sun Dec 18 01:49:13 PST 2005

In message <Pine.LNX.4.51.0512180919390.11978 at cartan.iecn.u-nancy.fr> you wrote:
> but the improvements are not significative. only 100 frames more displayed
> when one uses shm (with ~3000 frames), which is not big, imho. Did I make
> something wrong in the algorithm ?

The mechanism used by a modern TCP stack to optimize
internal traffic is basically a shared memory mechanism.  So
the performance shouldn't be noticeably different.

> btw, evas with xcb was using shm since one year ;)



More information about the Xcb mailing list