Barton C Massey
bart at cs.pdx.edu
Sun Apr 16 23:09:54 PDT 2006
Other than the horrible name :-), and the lack of an obvious
use case for the function :-), I'm not seeing what the issue
is. Could you or Josh attach a summary of the
question/problem to bug #6120, and maybe post it here?
Inquiring minds want to know!
In message <20060417044541.GM6307 at id.minilop.net> you wrote:
> > * Set a non-zero library version. Jamey, can we officially declare the
> > API/ABI stable?
> Recently you and I got as far as deciding that XCBGetRequestRead and
> isn't the right function for its job, but we had a little trouble with
> what we should provide instead. I think we should quickly wrap up that
> conversation before finally doing the ABI bump. This is bug #6120, and
> no other bugs affect API/ABI in backwards-incompatible ways.
More information about the Xcb