[Xcb] missing xdmcp in the wiki dev page

Keith Packard keithp at keithp.com
Sun May 7 00:17:18 PDT 2006

On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 23:26 -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:

> I'm still not satisfied that we're legally allowed to do that, so I
> rather like the current implementation's lack of any actual DES
> implementation. If you really feel replacing the current support for
> XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 with a different implementation is worth your time,
> would you get permission in writing from a lawyer or the State
> Department first?

Jim Gettys sent you mail last September 16 indicating that we indeed do
have permission to include DES support in the xcb implementation.


even has a nice disclaimer about this stuff. I'm not sure where this is
supposed to get linked into stuff; it's unlinked at present.

keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20060507/e8e821ad/attachment.pgp

More information about the Xcb mailing list