[Xcb] Re: GTK-XCB is in progress

[Yang JianJun]

In order to win the performance, I would like to make use of round-trip
delays to get work done in gdk-xcb firstly, which is impossible with Xlib in
general. Also the small library and transparent thread safety are the reason
of xcb-porting. These features have been illuminated a lot.

Jianjun

On 11/8/06, Ross Burton <ross at burtonini.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 15:28 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> > >> Anyway, I'd appreciate any advice/pointers you could provide, poking
> > >> at the gdk-xcb backends.
> > >
> > > Leaves me wondering, what do you see as the benefit of the XCB
> backends
> > > for the Gtk+ stack?
> >
> > I'd say thread-safety.
>
> And the ability to not link to libX11, which is relatively huge.
>
> Ros
> --
> Ross Burton                                 mail: ross at burtonini.com
>                                           jabber: ross at burtonini.com
>                                      www: http://www.burtonini.com./
> PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list at gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20061108/bb3f5059/attachment.html