[Xcb] keysymdef.h

[Vincent Torri]

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Ian Osgood wrote:

>
> On Nov 7, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> as we don't rely on X.h anymore, I suppose that we also don't rely on 
>> keysymdef.h. Shouldn't we provide an equivalent file for keysym codes ?
>> 
>> Vincent
>
> The keysym utility library does rely on <X11/keysymdef.h>, as does pretty 
> much anything that uses it.
>
> Why bother with an equivalent file? It doesn't have any other dependencies, 
> and it would just be another duplication of code to maintain.
>
> I feel the same about the set of standard atoms. I think it was unwise to 
> duplicate them for util/atom. Better would be to split these into two 
> separate packages that could be installed underneath either libX11 or libxcb.

Then why removing the X.h dependancy ? Following your idea, we should use 
what is defined in X.h.

Such file would not be a pain to maintain. Once it's done, there's nothing 
to maintain at all. Keysyms are also described in the X protocol 
(according to keysymdef.h : appendix A)

Vincent