[Xcb] Splitting up xcb-util repository

[Bart Massey]

Thanks huge for taking this on, Arnaud. Greatly appreciated. --Bart

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dirk Wallenstein <halsmit at t-online.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>     > It might  be beneficial for cloners if  the repos themselves would
>>     > have the xcb prefix, like: xcb-utils-wm.
>>
>> Currently, we  have xcb/util, so  I'm thinking about following  the same
>> naming  scheme for the  repositories to  be pushed,  namely xcb/util-wm,
>> xcb/util-keysyms and so  on. When you clone, you  can still do something
>> like:  git   clone  git://.../xcb/util  xcb-util,  but   maybe  I  don't
>> understand what you mean?
>
> Yes, that's what I meant.  But, being consistent is probably better
> here.
>
> It's just that I sometimes stumble upon this when writing modulesets.
> It would also be easier to find personal clones (are you working on
> xorg/font/util?).  However, it looks like there will be one big
> moduleset soon, and the need to generate modulesets with scripts will
> disappear.  So, no real problem.
>
> --
> Greetings,
> Dirk
> _______________________________________________
> Xcb mailing list
> Xcb at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb
>