[Xcb] About next release of xcb/util
Mikhail Gusarov
dottedmag at dottedmag.net
Tue Mar 23 12:43:44 PDT 2010
Twas brillig at 11:37:40 23.03.2010 UTC-07 when bart at cs.pdx.edu did gyre and gimble:
>> I've already been hit by a GNOME guy because when adding XCB support
>> to libstartup-notification I add to link this last one to 3 xcb-util
>> libs (event, atom and aux). And they say it slows down the
>> application startup (no clue about that, I'm not an expert in this
>> area).
BCM> The dynamic loader has been really broken in this area in the
BCM> past. IIRC it's mostly fixed now.
Sorry for offtopic - could you give any pointers? I'm bitten by exactly
this performance problem on smallish embedded device and exactly with
the libraries discussed: Enlightenment Foundation Libraries (lot of
small .so) backed by XCB (another set of small .so).
>> For people coming from Xlib, probably. I spent most time using XCB
>> than Xlib and I never had to use this stuff that just hides the
>> protocol, making people more stupid. They are interesting for
>> documentation purpose as I said, but to use them, no way IMHO.
BCM> I think we can agree to disagree on this one. :-) I can't imagine
BCM> what I'd be learning by hand-building the weird value lists that
BCM> the protocol wants, once I got the basic message that the protocol
BCM> wants weird value lists sometimes.
Just my to cents as a XCB user: yes, weird value lists are... weird, and
no fun to build.
--
http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20100324/c06e576c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xcb
mailing list