[Xcb] Win32 port -- git help

[Jeetu Golani]

Hi,

> I would expect WSASend() to be faster than an iterative send().

It would. I can't recall why exactly but as I remember it using send() 
required the least bit of changes to the xcb code. Will review it yet again 
though and see if I can optimize further.

> The ifdef within USE_POLL seems useless.

Will review

> also find the name a bit confusing considering that Win32 API defines
> <windef.h> (IIRC).

True. Am thinking of renaming this to xcb_windefs.h.

Thanks,
Jeetu
http://www.ebrain.in
- An open (GPL) platform to discover and run software off someone in the 
meshed network pool and use it on your own device.

On Saturday 27 March 2010, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:22:21 Jeetu Golani, you wrote:
> > What I would like to do is push this new branch onto my github repo which
> > would then contain the code for the earlier version and the updated (and
> > history).
> >
> > Unfortunately I'm not very good with git :(....I wonder what is the
> >  preferred practice by xcb devels to do this. Should I establish a new
> >  branch at my github repo? How should I tag this new branch? Should I
> > then merge this new branch to the current tree there?
> >
> > I'd appreciate advice (and git steps :) ) to achieve this updation.
> 
> I would expect WSASend() to be faster than an iterative send().
> 
> The ifdef within USE_POLL seems useless.
> 
> I wonder if XCB should be switched to use socket functions for I/O all the
> time. This would avoid most ifdefs. X11 cannot be run over anything but
> sockets anyway.
> 
> It was already mentioned, but I cannot find the windefs.h file anywhere. I
> also find the name a bit confusing considering that Win32 API defines
> <windef.h> (IIRC).
>