[Xcb] about proto and pthread-stub

Julien Danjou julien at danjou.info
Tue Jun 7 01:23:00 PDT 2011

On Tue, Jun 07 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:

> i'm wondering why proto and pthread-stub was separated from libxcb. My
> opinion is that such separation is usefull only if they were used elsewhere.
> Is it the case ? If no, what about integrating them into libxcb directory
> (that would avoid several checkouts, several runs of the autotools,
> configure's and make's)

Any language binding that want to generate code from the XML description
of the protocol only needs xcb-proto.
There's no good reason to merge both IMHO.

Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20110607/7b0c854c/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Xcb mailing list