[Xcb] about proto and pthread-stub

Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett.org
Tue Jun 7 01:41:37 PDT 2011

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:23:00AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > i'm wondering why proto and pthread-stub was separated from libxcb. My
> > opinion is that such separation is usefull only if they were used elsewhere.
> >
> > Is it the case ? If no, what about integrating them into libxcb directory
> > (that would avoid several checkouts, several runs of the autotools,
> > configure's and make's)
> Any language binding that want to generate code from the XML description
> of the protocol only needs xcb-proto.
> There's no good reason to merge both IMHO.

Language binding, protocol decoder, documentation generator...anything
that wants a machine-readable description of the X protocol should use

- Jsoh Triplett

More information about the Xcb mailing list