Flatpak is a Red Hat product?

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Is Flatpack trademarked? If so, who owns the trademark?

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:37 PM Charles Johnson <charlesjohnsont at outlook.com>
wrote:

> I see no comparison, if a NASA employee working on a project in their
> spare time, this project does not belongs to NASA:
>
> Flatpak was strongly supported by the GNOME project, but I see around
> saying belonging to GNOME now that it is independent (still a sponsor).
> Snap is a project of Canonical in every way as it is not Flatpak of Red
> Hat, so catches my attention.
>
>
> CJT
> ------------------------------
> *De:* Olli Ries <olli at olli-ries.com>
> *Enviado:* domingo, 7 de agosto de 2016 11:42:16 p. m.
> *Para:* Charles Johnson
> *Cc:* xdg-app at lists.freedesktop.org
> *Asunto:* Re: Flatpak is a Red Hat product?
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Charles Johnson <
> charlesjohnsont at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> I found the following discussion on the mailing lists of LibreOffice. Is
>> Flatpak a Red Hat  product?, I think the LO article is poorly expressed.
>>
> a product in terms of something they produce and you pay for? No.
> An opensource project RH heavily sponsors (Alex L is a "fellow" at RH)? yes
>
> Thus, really comparable from a set up POV with the mentioned snap packages.
> O.
> _______________________________________________
> xdg-app mailing list
> xdg-app at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg-app
>
-- 
How many people can stand on the shoulders of a giant before the giant
collapses?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/attachments/20160808/356de9f3/attachment.html>