Desktop File spec vs. KDE vs. gnome-panel

Waldo Bastian bastian at
Fri Aug 1 22:29:22 EEST 2003

Hash: SHA1

On Friday 01 August 2003 19:02, George wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:30:51PM +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> > > Hmmm, true.  In this case we just have to standardize on the KDE way of
> > > doing it.  And the spec needs to be updated.
> >
> > Yes, can you please provide a patch to it.
> Heh, damnit, did I just volunteer for this ? :)
> OK, here's the patch.  

Great, looks good.

> Changes description of %i, %c and %k to the KDE 
> semantics and makes it clearer as to what the behaviour for them should be.
> Also adds to the comment about %m and how it should be handled, if it is
> handled (it can just be ignored, that is expanded to no parameters).
> Also the spec currently says that unknown format chars are disallowed (a
> fatal error), so I added a note that deprecated format chars are allowed
> and can be ignored.

I'm still trying to find an example of something that actually uses %k :-}

- -- 
bastian at -=|[ SuSE, The Linux Desktop Experts ]|=- bastian at
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see


More information about the xdg mailing list