smproxy and gnome-smproxy break the XSMP
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak at suse.cz
Thu Jul 31 21:55:56 EEST 2003
On Thursday 31 of July 2003 17:00, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:25:23PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > 1. Remove smproxy from XFree and gnome-smproxy from GNOME with
> > the hope that all alive applications which use the old sm protocol
> > will switch to the new one. Probably a bad solution ...? By the
> > way it seems that KDE does not have and do not run by default a
> > sm proxy.
>
> I agree with Owen that this is right, the smproxy stuff is just a bad
> idea.
>
> I think KDE does have some "try to manage non-SM apps" code also, I
> don't remember the details though. Someone was claiming that KDE
> successfully restarts netscape/mozilla for example.
Confirmed. Even though Mozilla here restarted as mozilla-bin does not really
restart, most probably missing some LD_LIBRARY_PATH that's set up in the
mozilla script.
>
> My memory is that I tried to find the code that did this and didn't
> succeed.
Used to be in KWin, now in ksmserver.
> Anyway, so I don't know whether it would have the same issue
> or not.
I don't think I quite understand the problem, but we use WM_SAVE_YOURSELF
only on windows which don't have the SM_CLIENT_ID property, and those apps
running under different session manager (weird, does somebody really do
that?) should have it anyway. But then, I don't understand how the proposed
solution is supposed to fix anything, so maybe I just fail to see the
problem.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak at suse.cz , l.lunak at kde.org
Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
More information about the xdg
mailing list