That 'vision' thing (Tuomas has a logo proposal)
Carl Worth
cworth at east.isi.edu
Wed Nov 5 16:43:55 EET 2003
On Nov 4, Keith Packard wrote:
> One problem we've discovered with Gadget is that it is not well hinted, so
> you get weird rendering artifacts if you don't hit one of the few sweet
> pixel sizes (note the 'k' in the sample provided). We can obviously pick
> a better size for the site logo, but that still leaves it looking ugly in
> other environments, making it unsuitable for use within the web pages.
Here's a rendering of the logo using hinted Gadget at a slightly
larger size that seems to hit one of the hints' sweet-spots, (notice
the 'k' and 'p' glyphs are no longer so distorted):
http://freedesktop.org/~cworth/logo-samples.html
The path-based version is rendered at the same size for comparison.
Personally, I prefer the hinted version much more for the web page.
The existence of the path-based version does allow us to use it
anywhere the font is not available or where the font hints would cause
unacceptable artifacts.
-Carl
PS. Cairo rendered these. Freetype did the hinted font rasterization.
More information about the xdg
mailing list