gnome-hello

[Mike Hearn]

Owen Taylor wrote:
> (Excluding deprecated or marked-unstable functionality). Possible
>  other additions,  in what I would consider priority order:
 >
>  libglade

Hmm, I thought the long term plan was to move libglade inside GTK+?

>  libgnomeprint, libgnomeprintui
>  GConf

I don't think the LSB wants to go the route of specifying parts of GNOME 
or KDE. They are already platforms with strict versioning policies, 3rd 
party ISVs can depend on "Gnome 2.6" as a whole and get an ABI stable 
platform, if not one that's formally specced out. Also, the uh ... 
discussions favouring one desktop project over the other could cause 
would be painful.

It's probably best to stick to software that has wide usage outside of 
any particular desktop, so GTK+, Qt and libxml2 would qualify but 
libgnome*/gconf would not.

thanks -mike