Proposal and RFC: Introducing DAL, the "Desktop Abstraction Layer"
mike at navi.cx
Thu Jan 13 18:55:31 EET 2005
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:33:46 +0100, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote:
> IMHO there is really no additional daemon need as Galago propose.
The daemon issue has been hashed out lots of times, and there are strong
technical reasons why Christian did it that way. Have you considered the
same issues? If so why is Christian wrong about them?
Just saying it's "too heavyweight" doesn't fly sorry, it's a very
low overhead process which doesn't do much except track data. How do you
solve the same problems it was designed to solve without an extra process?
More information about the xdg