Alexander Larsson alexl at redhat.com
Fri Mar 4 18:05:43 EET 2005

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 16:59 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I don't think any deep integration with D-VFS is necessary. Perhaps it
> could be useful to once create a D-VFS 'plugin' to handle D-Conf keys
> as files on a filesystem. That way it wouldn't be necessary to write a
> gconf-editor equivalent. 

This sounds like a bad idea. See any of my many rants when someone
proposes a new "not-really-a-user-document-storage" backend for

Furthermore, i highly doubt that any user would consider such a
filesystem a "gconf-editor equivalent", or that any implementer of a
gconf-editor style app would want to use this filesystem instead of the
normal config API.

 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl at redhat.com    alla at lysator.liu.se 
He's an unconventional gay waffle chef fleeing from a secret government 
programme. She's a supernatural winged barmaid from out of town. They fight 

More information about the xdg mailing list