thiago at kde.org
Thu Apr 6 10:20:49 EEST 2006
Benjamin Rich wrote:
>But we are still left with this pointless separation. Why not have one
>place only for applications, and one place for a user's files?
We had this discussion in a KDE mailing list a few years ago and I
remember it was quite heated. There was a strong resistance to making the
the desktop show icons for stuff that is in $HOME.
The simple reason being that we don't want to clutter the desktop with
icons for files and directories that are in $HOME but will never be
clicked on. For example, I have ~/src, ~/obj and ~/bin. Why should I ever
want to click the "bin" folder in my desktop? The few scripts I placed
there are not graphical desktop stuff.
One other thing: there are still many legacy applications that require
files on home. Sometimes those files are not hidden (think of license.txt
files). Why should these files be shown in the desktop?
We ended up concluding that $HOME and Desktop are two different things.
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
thiago.macieira (AT) trolltech.com Trolltech AS
GPG: 0x6EF45358 | Sandakerveien 116,
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C | NO-0402
966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 | Oslo, Norway
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20060406/487addfd/attachment.pgp
More information about the xdg