simple search api (was Re: mimetype standardisation by testsets)

Jos van den Oever jvdoever at
Sun Dec 3 12:38:01 EET 2006

2006/12/3, Joe Shaw <joeshaw at>:
> Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > Just a quick idea,
> >
> > How about using JSON ( <>) as to
> > represent the query objects (instead of xml)?
> I'm reluctant to do this because I'm not sure how comprehensive the
> stacks are for C#.  The XML stacks we have -- the built in one in Mono,
> or libxml2 for C -- are very mature parts of the platforms.
> > It is light, easily readable, widespread, and there is possibility to
> > write extremely fast parsers.
> Maybe, but we should be focusing our efforts on building the search
> software, not on hot-serialization-technology-of-the-day parsers.

I agree. Lets just say that the simple interface cannot have nested
queries, in other works, no brackets. Then it is possible to use dbus
for specifying the query object.

More information about the xdg mailing list