Desktop Emblems Proposed Spec
John Stowers
john.stowers.lists at gmail.com
Thu Feb 1 10:57:23 EET 2007
> Generally the spec looks well worked out. Three things:
>
> * How about allowing base64 encoded images to be inlined in the .emblem?
> This is bad for theming purposes but might also be easier in many cases.
Makes sense I guess. Another compromise is restricting IconName to
only allow icon files to be in the same directory as the .emblem file.
In hindsight this might be better from a security perspective.
> * If you allow user definable tags with associated .emblems you should
> probably enforce that DisplayName==Keyword
Doesnt this introduce a whole slew of problems from the application
developers perspective? For example, a program written in X, which
ships a bunch of .emblems expects to be able to associate files with
that emblem using a locale independent Keyword, presumably coded
somewhere in the program.
They then expect a user of Nautilus, running in locale Y to be shown
the translated .emblem name.
> * How about putting this on the fdo wiki? That way you can also collect
> comments on the wiki page.
Done
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards_2fdesktop_2demblem_2dspec
More information about the xdg
mailing list