shared wasabi implementation
Max Wiehle
max.wiehle at gmail.com
Mon Feb 19 14:48:05 PST 2007
Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Mikkel Kamstrup
Erlandsen:
> 2007/2/19, Max Wiehle <max.wiehle at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Hope it's okay if i just jump right into the discussion. I
> just read
> about wasabi on a dashboard-hackers and i am quite interested
> in it so i
> tried to catch up with the mailing list archive. I worked on a
> metadata
> store for beagle during last years Summer of Code and i am
> still trying
> to follow what happens on the desktop search / metadata side
> of things
> as time permits.
>
> Am Sonntag, den 18.02.2007, 21:15 +0100 schrieb Mikkel
> Kamstrup
> Erlandsen:
>
> >
> > Ok. If we are to standardize something like this, I would
> assume that
> > we use dbus for rpc - as far as I can tell that doesn't seem
> to be a
> > problem..? Fx a dbus api like:
> >
> > - AddFile (in as metadata, in s input_file)
> > - AddText (in as metadata, in s text)
> >
> > where the metadata argument contains things such as uri,
> mime, and hit
> > type (in some specified order (and maybe some
> > filtering/stemming/whatnot info)). The AddFile method sorta
> replaces
> > the "drop-in-special-dir" approach - the drop-in-special-dir
> method
> > could still be allowed for apps not talking dbus. The
> AddText method
> > should encapsulate the functionality of Beagles' current
> > IndexServiceRequest/Indexable duo.
>
> Maybe it would be possible to have a
> - AddMetadata (in as metadata, in s uri)
> as well. This could be used for all kinds of metadata that is
> added to a
> object aside from indexing. fx tags, emblems, notes in
> nautilus. Or
> epiphany might add "downloaded_from" to a files metadata -
> saved
> attachements could be marked as belonging to a certain email
> and vice
> versa etc.
>
>
> Agreed. I figure this belongs under the Wasabi metadata spec and api -
> which is yet to be discussed. Maybe I better kick that off soonish -
> the search spec relies on some bits and pieces from it anyway.
>
> The two methods I mention is specifically only targeting an indexer
> since I don't think it should be a requirement to both an indexer and
> metadata storage.
Okay, i did not know there was a seperate metadata spec and api. Makes
sense.
> Is there any where we can have a look at your work?
Its in the beagle svn in
http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/beagle/branches/beagle-metadata-branch/
mostly in beagled/SqliteMetadata/...
It's only the store and some internal beagle changes that save metadata
to the store. But there is no external api yet.
EntityStore.cs is the central store.
SqlMetaTests/TestEntityStoreBasics.cs illustrates the usage a little
bit.
SqlMetadata.cs implements an EntityStore that tries to verify metadata
against a model supplied in SqlMetaModel and stores it marked as
non_verified anyway if it can't be verified.
If there are any questions please ask. I am quite busy right now but i
will be working on similar things from april on for my diploma thesis so
i will try and keep in touch.
Max
More information about the xdg
mailing list