well-known user folders, a proposal
alexl at redhat.com
Thu Feb 22 10:06:18 PST 2007
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 10:01 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:51:54 -0800, Alexander Larsson <alexl at redhat.com>
> >> I'd prefer to remove the config file to remove functionality. This
> >> would make it easier for scripts to detect with [ -f ]. If config
> >> file exist specific directories could be disabled by commenting them
> >> out (not specifying them).
> > I'm not sure what you mean. The config file is read by the program run
> > on login that creates/updates directories. Nothing else should really
> > read it. Why would they want to do that anyway? For instance, the users
> > ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs file might be totally manually written and not
> > generated from the config at all.
> Right, the [ -f ] should never be neeeded, but if root needs to do some
> manteinance on a home dir by any chance, this make it easier.
> I am thinking that the default user config file should read the /etc
> version to take the defaults if the user hasn't decided to tweak them. The file could
> be easily provided by /etc/skel. Functionality would be as simple as removing
> the config file. (Read: opt-in approach, with everybody opted-in by
I don't quite understand what you mean. Are you talking about the
user-dirs.conf file or the user-dirs.defaults file?
Also, /etc/skel is not generally a great way to add stuff. It only works
for newly created users. Not for things like distro upgrades, old NFS
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl at redhat.com alla at lysator.liu.se
He's a superhumanly strong Republican messiah in a wheelchair. She's a violent
impetuous vampire with an MBA from Harvard. They fight crime!
More information about the xdg