Problems with Screensavers and other activity sensitive demons.

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:29 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:

>  Ok, I'll try with simpler words :). The XScreensaver extensions is not a 
> perfectly good one, it's not even a good one. In fact, it sucks, it's broken, 
> and there's apparently nobody to fix it. But I'd indeed like to be proven 
> wrong (and, as I said, KDE after all tries to do the best with it).

It would be far more helpful if you would propose fixes instead of just
ranting about the existing state of affairs. Even just a proposed spec
for a new API would be far better than 'it doesn't work and no-one is
fixing it'.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20070608/773df214/attachment.pgp