Richard Hughes hughsient at
Thu Mar 29 14:33:35 PDT 2007

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:07 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > as an option in it's configuration interface. You should be free to
> do
> > that in your implementation. The org.fd.PM specification does not
> > prevent you from such an UI and it shouldn't. This specification
> should
> > care about the needs of applications.
> I fully agree on all this.
> > (I don't, however, such UI is good UI nor do I think it belongs in
> > gnome-power-manager. But that's up to Richard and the GNOME project
> I suppose.)
> And as a conclusion, if no one else has any comments on this, I think
> we should let it up to Richard to decide whether to take the Standby()
> methods or not. 

Well, I respect all of your opinions here, and I think the overall
consensus is that Standby has no place in the spec.

I'll rip it out for version 0.2.

Also, I was advised that GetBatteryState is a pretty bad name. What
about GetOnBattery or GetBatteryStatus for version 0.2?


More information about the xdg mailing list