hughsient at gmail.com
Sat Mar 31 03:10:49 PDT 2007
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:21 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> (Of course, we haven't defined how locking on org.freedesktop.Hal.
> Device.SystemPowerManagement will work just yet.. but I took it into
> account with the new HAL locking API that went into HEAD earlier this
> week. This is needed not only for this.. but also to make multiple
> session-based PM daemons work for both fast-user-switching and
> So, InhibitManual() should probably go and we should advise that
> "system" apps simply lock the system mechanism. This makes a lot more
> sense I think; Richard?
Yes, I think I agree with this. InhibitAuto becomes Inhibit, and
InhibitManual gets punted to something system (HAL?) level.
More information about the xdg