Summary of the fdo disussion at GCDS

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote:
> So that a given project has a single voice, to avoid the situation where
> several people from a given project have contradictory opinions and then

is that seriously an issue? if so, the projects involved have fatal problems 
and need to revisit themselves before even thinking cooperating with other 
projects.

but let's assume that it is an issue as a worst-case scenario. there's a 
reason why source code repositories have reversion controls. it's not hard.

look at kde with it's WIDE open commit policies. how often have we had to 
check abuse of that? twice that i can remember. in 10 years.

let's not make this more complicated with possible-but-not-realistic issues.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20090709/c7b85735/attachment.pgp