Summary of the fdo disussion at GCDS

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > * we provide a process in which ALL projects can register their
> > acceptance, implementation, rejection, etc of specs
>
> Yes, actually that's what was suggested during the meeting.
> The initial idea of a global "fd.o approved" / "fd.o rejected" status
> quickly turned into something that was more like
> gnome-approved [yes/no] kde-approved [yes/no] xfce-approved [yes/no]
> lxde-approved [yes/no] etc.

sounds good. if this information is machine readable, then we're golden.

> (which is separate from "implemented in gnome
> 2.4; implemented in kde 4.3", of course; we can approve something much
> before finding the time to implement it)

right; that information is more useful to those targeting the specs.

> (Technically it's: [yes | no | not decided yet], of course)

yes | no | rejected | not decided. ;)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20090709/b0e4ae72/attachment.pgp