Summary of the fdo disussion at GCDS

[Jeremy]

On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:46 AM, "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo at kde.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote:
>> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> * we provide a process in which ALL projects can register their
>>> acceptance, implementation, rejection, etc of specs
>>
>> Yes, actually that's what was suggested during the meeting.
>> The initial idea of a global "fd.o approved" / "fd.o rejected" status
>> quickly turned into something that was more like
>> gnome-approved [yes/no] kde-approved [yes/no] xfce-approved [yes/no]
>> lxde-approved [yes/no] etc.
>
> sounds good. if this information is machine readable, then we're  
> golden.
>
>> (which is separate from "implemented in gnome
>> 2.4; implemented in kde 4.3", of course; we can approve something  
>> much
>> before finding the time to implement it)
>
> right; that information is more useful to those targeting the specs.
>
>> (Technically it's: [yes | no | not decided yet], of course)
>
> yes | no | rejected | not decided. ;)

Hehe, what's the difference between no and rejected? I think three  
options suffice.

Jeremy whiting

>
> -- 
> Aaron J. Seigo
> humru othro a kohnu se
> GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
>
> KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
> _______________________________________________
> xdg mailing list
> xdg at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg