Starting discussion on a new version of the notification spec
Mirco Müller
mirco.mueller at canonical.com
Mon Jun 15 02:38:16 PDT 2009
Am Samstag, den 13.06.2009, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
> > 3. The Ubuntu spec adds a 'sound-themed' hint, while we already have
> > 'sound-file'. I'd suggest just overloading 'sound-file' to take either
> > a sound theme name or a sound file. Implementations that only support a
> > full path will simply fail to play it; no big deal. With 'overloading',
> > implementations don't have to handle Yet Another Hint. Downside: apps
> > wishing to provide a sound theme name plus a fallback sound file path
> > won't be able to. Is that a big deal? (There's also the cosmetic
> > question as to what "sound-themed" logically means. It should be
> > something like "sound-name" or "themed-sound-name".)
>
> This is only present on the wiki page, notify-osd does not support sound
> at all at the moment. I believe this is just a mistake.
notify-osd not yet supporting sound (via libcanberra) is a "mistake" on
my behalf. I just wasn't able to finish it in time. It's still on the
ToDo-list though.
Best regards ...
Mirco
More information about the xdg
mailing list