[Xesam] condition of 1.0 ?
Roberto Guido
bob4mail at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 15:57:15 PDT 2009
On Thursday 23 April 2009 23:03:10 you wrote:
> One: its counter productive to
> get into a meta-discussion at this point. Two: This discussion will be
> very very long :-)
>
Glad to posticipate this after 1.0 :-)
> * Copy (or "branch") the pages
> * Fix all links
> * Make a Xesam100 page just like we have for Xesam95 and Xesam90
>
Done (not by me but by Michele, a friend of mine concerned like me about Xesam
specification and involved in this work).
I'm currently working on the Changelog, looking on changes from
http://xesam.org/main/XesamSearchAPI95 and
http://xesam.org/main/XesamSearchAPI100 : do already exists it, maintained
while the specification revision?
--
Roberto -MadBob- Guido
http://claimid.com/madbob
More information about the Xesam
mailing list