[Xesam] packaging problem

[Ivan Frade]

hi!

 New version of the script...


- the one you mentioned: have parameters for input and output files
>
Done


> - Using :metadata and :ontology is not correct. The graphs are described in
>  the metadata file in the statement:
>     ?metadataGraph nrl:coreGraphMetadataFor ?ontologyGraph


Not sure i get what do you mean. ":ontology" should be the "ontology" URI ?
we dont have that information in the ontology itself. Should it be a
different parameter? Can you explain it with an example?


>
> - Any chance you could add indentation and empty lines between prefixes and
>  the graphs?

Added few empty lines between prefixes block, ontology graph, metadata
graph.
It it is still not ok, an example is welcome.


>
> - change the order: start with the ontology, then the metadata graph
>
Done


>
> Hm, I just noticed that you created your own vocabulary to describe the
> metadata instead of using NRL. Is there a specific reason for that?


That "vocabulary" was an ad-hoc invention when i was playing with our own
documentation system. Take it only as an example, nothing serious has been
done with it.

regards,

Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xesam/attachments/20090701/93a33de9/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: triger.tgz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 1181 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xesam/attachments/20090701/93a33de9/attachment.bin