[Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag

[Evgeny Egorochkin]

Basically I think the biggest concern here is interoperability between nao:Tag 
and pimo:Tag.

How can applications that use nao:Tag and pimo:Tag "talk" to each other?

В сообщении от Пятница 25 сентября 2009 19:30:58 автор Leo Sauermann написал:
> as others may be interested in this discussion, I am also including xesam
> (= the ontology developers list)
> 
> I was a bit slow to answer, sorry.
> 
> Tomás - what are you programming? do you have a url or a blogpost about
> your work?
> 
> nao:Tag is for systems that just use NAO/NIE and are fine with
> no-brainer solutions.
> a nao:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a string. its unique.
> 
> pimo:Tag is for systems that want to achieve a highlevel integration of
> Addressbooks, Calendars, Websites, etc... into a semantic network.
> pimo:Tags are then not only tags, but can be also a pimo:Person - that
> is, you can use a person's name to tag something but - surprise - it is
> also a person.
> now clicking on the person will get more...
> a pimo:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a unique string
> which is also a Thing out of the real world which can have more attributes.
> 
> I also documented this here in the FAQ
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/wiki/PIMO/FAQ#Whatisthedifferencebe
> tweennao:Tagandpimo:Tag
> 
> best
> Leo
> 
> 
> 
> It was Tomás Vírseda who said at the right time 12.09.2009 23:50 the
> 
> following words:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm confused about pimo:Tag and nao:Tag classes described in their
> > respective ontology. Which is the difference between these two clases?
> > I'm reading the ontologies documentation but I can't still figure out
> > how they should be used. I'm developing a tagging system in a
> > application and I would like to use Nepomuk.
> >
> > About pimo:Tag description:
> > "Tags in the context of PIMO. A marker class for Things that are used
> > to categorize documents (or other things). Tags must be a kind of
> > Thing and must have a unique label. Documents should not be Tags by
> > default."
> >
> > About nao:Tag description:
> > "This class is useful for modelling conventional tagging practices.
> > The user can tag resources in conventional ways, automatically
> > creating an instance of this tag, which is then related to the
> > annotated resource via the nao:hasTag property. For more on tagging as
> > annotation see Section 2.3.". I've read this section and the
> > explanation is very convincing.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Kind regards
> >
> > --
> > Tomás Vírseda
> > _______________________________________________
> > people mailing list
> > people at semanticdesktop.org
> > http://lists.semanticdesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/people
>