[xliff-tools] Eviltrans - Open source transilation suite
Asgeir Frimannsson
asgeirf at redhat.com
Mon Mar 21 15:32:12 PST 2005
Hi Fredrik,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:19, Fredrik Corneliusson wrote:
> > Didn't get your TM running though, but will give it a new shot over the
> > weekend. (Had some problems with paths etc)
>
> There's an ugly import of xmlutils using relative path in there that
> could be the issue. be sure to cd to the tmServers dir before
> launching it. The TM is probably going to be a separate entity in the
> future. At this time the TM is very basic and cant save or import TMX
> yet but Fredrik Estreen is working on it.
>
Yep, xmlUtils was the problem (fixed it the easy way by copying over the
xmlUtils folder to tmServers). Works fine now, but I can't see the TM window
in the editor. From the debug window, it looks like entries are added fine to
the TM, but I never get suggestions in the editor (as in the screenshot),
even for equal strings.
One thing I really like about 'transolution' is the fact that you separate the
TM from the actual editor using xmlRPC. Looking forward to see how this
evolves. Some of my wishlist items are:
- Published xmlRPC specifications
- methods to import TMX documents (then we can test this out by exporting our
PO compendiums to TMX and testing on real-world data)
- method to pre-translate XLIFF files.
You mention about sentence based segmentation, but how does your editor/TM
support this? If I convert a document to XLIFF using paragraph segmentation,
it will still be paragraph segmented in the TM when editing in your editor?
> > Let me know if you guys are interested in somewhat linking this project
> > in with the xliff-tools project. This project's goal is to overall
> > implement XLIFF support in open source localisation. I'll anyway add a
> > link to this project in the 'Resources' section in our wiki.
>
> It would definitely be intresting to cooperate.
>
> We have been considering a name change from the start but we did not
> want to be held up any longer for our lack of imagination (all the
> obvious ones are taken). We thought about Transolution, Locomotion
> etc. Please feel free to give your suggestions.
You're definetely more creative than me when it comes to names, so won't try
any suggestions :) But you've decided on Transolution, - works fine with
me :)
cheers,
asgeir
More information about the xliff-tools
mailing list