[xliff-tools] Another question on PO and XLIFF
Asgeir Frimannsson
asgeirf at redhat.com
Tue May 3 13:54:11 PDT 2005
Morning all :)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 00:25, Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 15:01 +0100, Tim Foster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > BTW, current Java implementation in CVS treats "\n" as text, it does
> > > not surround it with <ph></ph>. Now I think that if the c-format flag
> > > is present, then "\n" should be placed inside a <ph> element.
> >
> > Yep, definitely : if you know something about the source-formatting, it
> > makes sense to try to use the capabilities in XLIFF to their full
> > potential.
>
> Totally agreed. I will do the changes as soon as possible. I think that
> other special escape codes, like "\t" or "\r" should be managed in the
> same way.
>
> Asgeir,
>
> I think that your C filters should do the same.
I believe this is a highly translator unfriendly approach - and not using the
XML features available, but I'm not very stubborn or 'religious' in my views
on this - so if this is the general view on the issue, I'll change my filters
to conform to this approach :) ... But a round on the issue with the XLIFF TC
would be beneficial first.
cheers,
asgeir
More information about the xliff-tools
mailing list