WireShark (was: Spurious bad X_ChangeProperty and MappingNotify)

Peter Harris pharris at opentext.com
Fri Apr 17 13:21:07 PDT 2009


Pat Kane wrote:
> 
> I did not realize that WireShark could take apart X11 packets,  how
> does it compare
> to xscope?

I haven't used xscope in ages. I don't know if modern xscope does
extensions.

The main advantage to WireShark is it shows network-level problems
(packet retransmissions, reset packets, et al) that xscope doesn't
(since xscope only works at the X protocol level IIRC).

The main disadvantage is that stock WireShark does not handle X extensions.

There is a patch to add extension support (based on XCB, so it should
stay as up-to-date as XCB is), but it hasn't been applied yet:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2981
(I'd say "please vote", but they don't appear to have enabled voting...)

Peter Harris
-- 
               Open Text Connectivity Solutions Group
Peter Harris                    http://www.opentext.com/connectivity
Research and Development        Phone: +1 905 762 6001
pharris at opentext.com            Toll Free: 1 877 359 4866


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list