New development model check-in.
daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Nov 18 04:01:50 PST 2009
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:38:01AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 20:58 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > It's not working too well for EXA yet; a number of acked patches haven't
> > > been applied yet.
> > I'd suggest creating your own tree and sending pull requests, rather
> > than relying on random patchsets on the list being vaccuumed up ...
> Are there at least any indications that we're getting any tangible
> benefits from this increased workload?
You don't think it's a little early to tell? I mean, we're only, what,
six weeks in? Less?
I'd say the increased patch review has been a definite plus.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20091118/7004ea6d/attachment.pgp
More information about the xorg-devel