[PATCH libXi] fix build with gcc 2.95

[Michael]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Aug 26, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:37:57AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:53:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> Looks like a sufficiently trivial change, but what system still  
>>> using
>>> gcc 2.95 does anyone care about running modern X.Org on?
>>
>> I have to repeat this every time I send a patch for gcc 2.95... :)
>
> In fairness, it is rather unintuitive that an allegedly supported
> OS/architecture combination must have the absolute newest X server,  
> yet
> hasn't managed to update its compiler in just over 11 years[0].

Funny, we ( NetBSD that is ) use gcc4 on sparc without trouble.
That said, I have a bunch of patches ( mostly adding hw acceleration )  
and drivers for SBus graphics hardware - any interest?

have fun
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBTHcIaspnzkX8Yg2nAQKmpgf/c7CckqgQ8FFVl8j3QkLgDZ5HIh6thWMM
qifaTCpFWxs/GayaCoROawAH1PgwaCuV6oL7m4u+dfJ7E5JIzMGUXuCAT2vkc+hY
A2sgNvzTK+pMHH3z6WgjE5pocPrRgFP2QRdu+uWiXrHs2yZ/MTbnmiZmfb7M0KgN
aTCjWT+HPURElyw1r2sO03yk0DQQ8Ztfva9yageqUzgiF1p8HT+C8byZCBmW1ZuD
E87IplY8bT5bAyhnEslSRzRlp9UhjJIp6jaEsNY/7WsxTVvK7beTtDaOOpWGAWSq
wsAIYTKJb4mUyxuTvFxtuu4tBY7p/sJfOEZMP9CpX/cGgU9OeHfPVw==
=vVHd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----