pointer acceleration property rename and docs

[Fernando Carrijo]

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:19 +1000, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:28:38AM -0200, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:31:16 +0100, Simon Thum <simon.thum at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > here's some hopefully final embellishments.
> > > 
> > > Fernando, thanks for reviewing. If you wish a more formal attribution,
> > > please send your reviewed-by tag.
> > 
> > I refrained from the idea of engraving a reviewed-by tag for believing
> > that such a practice was reserved for those whose voices were louder
> > than mine. Anyhow, here it goes...
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Fernando Carrijo <fcarrijo at yahoo.com.br>
> 
> not really, if you reviewed it then you can state so. The definition of the
> tag is:
> "Reviewed-by: A Reviewed-by tag is a statement of opinion that the patch is
> an appropriate modification of the kernel without any remaining serious
> technical issues. Any interested reviewer (who has done the work) can offer
> a Reviewed-by tag for a patch."
>  
> From http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches,
> which itself is partially copied from the kernel's
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> Bonus points for spotting which word needs to be replaced with "X Server".
> 
> Cheers,
>   Peter
> 

Hi Peter,

I've been lurking around for long enough to get somehow acquainted with
the discussions regarding the meanings of s-o-b & friends. But even so,
I use to feel kinda guilty for sending you busy people fixes as trivial
as s/kernel/X Server/, followed or not by reviewed-by tags.

It's nice to know that you are open for those modest contributions.

Cheers,
Fernando Carrijo.