[RFC] Refactoring of dix/dixutils.c

[Daniel Stone]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:22:23PM -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> I probably didn't understand quite well the reason for what you guys mean by
> server-side XCB. Google did't help too much either, although I wonder it might
> be not far from avoiding the burden of maintaining bulky and error-prone code
> by automatically generating server internal request dispatch stubs based on XML
> descriptions of the protocol.

Correct!

> Is it better documented somewhere?

I think there have been a couple of GSoC projects along those lines.

> Either way, I took notes of all people's opinions because I really plan to
> further investigate these questions in the future, as soon as I finish some
> other more immediate tasks. For the time being, I will deliver a patch series
> based on this RFC, with minor stylistic modifications.

Sounds fine to me, though my word is not gospel. :)

Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100730/e259e003/attachment.pgp>