tinderbox configuration

Jamey Sharp jamey at minilop.net
Tue Jun 22 11:01:00 PDT 2010

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> wrote:
>   > Nobody reviewed and the patch to video-dummy works for me, so I
>   > pushed it.
>   >
>   > I also pushed an equivalent patch to geode, after fixing that
>   > driver for the devPrivates rework. I compile-tested those patches
>   > but can't verify that the whole driver compiles since I'm
>   > building on a 64-bit system.
> Thanks!  We'll see whether it still builds on the next tinderbox run.

Yup, both of these drivers built successfully in the just-completed
tinderbox run. Yay! The xgi driver looks to be a mess, but that's not
due to any xserver changes more recent than 2008.

>   > By the way, Chris, why is the x86 tinderbox processing xcb a
>   > second time at the end?
> It's running libxcb's "make check" at that point, along with the other
> runtime tests.  I should use a different name for it.

It runs 'make check' in the earlier libxcb phase too though, and XCB's
test suite (such as it is) doesn't depend on any other X.org modules,
so it shouldn't need an extra pass.

Also, nothing is actually checked either time, because 'check' is not
available on the machine named "live". Could you fix that?

It came up recently that `make distcheck` was broken for
pthread-stubs. Would you consider adding distcheck to the tinderbox?


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list