tinderbox configuration

Jon TURNEY jon.turney at dronecode.org.uk
Tue Jun 22 12:33:12 PDT 2010

On 22/06/2010 19:01, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Chris Ball<cjb at laptop.org>  wrote:
>>    >  Nobody reviewed and the patch to video-dummy works for me, so I
>>    >  pushed it.
>>    >
>>    >  I also pushed an equivalent patch to geode, after fixing that
>>    >  driver for the devPrivates rework. I compile-tested those patches
>>    >  but can't verify that the whole driver compiles since I'm
>>    >  building on a 64-bit system.
>> Thanks!  We'll see whether it still builds on the next tinderbox run.
> Yup, both of these drivers built successfully in the just-completed
> tinderbox run. Yay! The xgi driver looks to be a mess, but that's not
> due to any xserver changes more recent than 2008.
>>    >  By the way, Chris, why is the x86 tinderbox processing xcb a
>>    >  second time at the end?
>> It's running libxcb's "make check" at that point, along with the other
>> runtime tests.  I should use a different name for it.
> It runs 'make check' in the earlier libxcb phase too though, and XCB's
> test suite (such as it is) doesn't depend on any other X.org modules,
> so it shouldn't need an extra pass.
> Also, nothing is actually checked either time, because 'check' is not
> available on the machine named "live". Could you fix that?

Also, I'm not sure that the version of jhbuild in use on live is actually 
checking the result of 'make check' correctly, see e.g.:


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list