[PATCH util/modular] xorg.modules: Replace individual proto modules with xorgproto

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 17:41:23 UTC 2018


On 1 March 2018 at 13:35, Jon Turney <jon.turney at dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
> On 28/02/2018 15:17, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 28 February 2018 at 13:04, Jon Turney <jon.turney at dronecode.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Turney <jon.turney at dronecode.org.uk>
>>> ---
>>>   xorg.modules | 845
>>> ++++++++++-------------------------------------------------
>>>   1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 702 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xorg.modules b/xorg.modules
>>> index b34d14d..93bc8cf 100644
>>> --- a/xorg.modules
>>> +++ b/xorg.modules
>>> @@ -65,35 +65,7 @@
>>>     <!-- X11 Protocol & Extensions - Meta Module -->
>>>     <metamodule id="The X11 Protocols">
>>>       <dependencies>
>>
>>
>>> -      <dep package="xcb-proto"/>
>>
>> Should stay?
>
>
> Oops.
>
>>
>>> +      <dep package="xorgproto"/>
>>>       </dependencies>
>>>     </metamodule>
>>>
>>> @@ -366,257 +338,13 @@
>>
>>
>>
>>> +  <meson id="xorgproto">
>>
>> I'd say keep this as autotools and toggle as 2/2...
>>
>>> +    <branch module="xorg/proto/xorgproto"
>>> +            checkoutdir="xorg/proto/xorgproto"/>
>>>       <dependencies>
>>> -      <dep package="util-macros"/>
>>> -    </dependencies>
>>> -    <suggests>
>>>         <dep package="xorg-sgml-doctools"/>
>>> -    </suggests>
>>
>> .. hence this hunk will stay as-is and drop util-macros with 2/2?
>
>
> I don't really see using a meson as a change as this module didn't exists
> before, but I take your point that it reduces the diff.
>
>>
>> It's fairly fiddly to have the above subtleties within such a massive
>> patch.
>>
>> With the above, tweaks:
>> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>
>
> Updated patch attached.
>
The comments are addressed. I trust you haven't changed anything else ;-)
Fwiw my r-b still stands.

-Emil


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list