Problems getting developer access to the xorg cvs
ufz6 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
Fri Oct 29 17:52:00 PDT 2004
> But I do feel that CVS access should be a priviledge granted sometime after a
> person has individually shown themselves to be a worthwhile & useful
> developer. It's obviously a lot less contentious to weed people out *before*
> granting CVS access to being in a position later on where you have to yank it,
> which is always going to lead to hard feelings.
I work on LG project, which use Xorg and I made alot of bugs fixed for that release.
our release was not before in Xserver CVS, therefore you don't have got
you do also a lot of works for DRI.
> So, in respect to your developer, I don't see any posts to this list from him
> (though I don't have a full archive, so I could be wrong) - shouldn't some
> basic participation in the public lists be a prerequisite to CVS access?
correct your wrong here. I have posts alot of topic on this list and
also on DRI list (because we also should support GL redirection in the
More information about the xorg