Frame Buffer Power Management / was: Re: The ati petition
roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
Sat Sep 4 15:45:42 PDT 2004
Alex Deucher wrote:
> > ATI probably THINK they're doing a good job with supporting Unix users
> > and their fglrx closed source drivers. And for SOME users (OK. The
> > majority) it probably works quite well. That's desktop people who don't
> > use ACPI for power management, and who never need to suspend their
> > machines etc..
> Part of the problem is X (xorg/xfree86) has no support for ACPI. They
> are merely working within the framework provided by the windowing
> system. No X driver supports ACPI. Full ACPI would probably require
> at least some sort of kernel component and for the most part X is
> completely userspace. Do any of the other binary-only drivers support
> power management at all? Until X gets proper power management support
> don't look for things to really improve.
s/X/Xorg,Xfree86/ ... Sun has fully functional power managment for their
own graphics cards (search http://docs.sun.com/ for "FBPM" (="Frame
Buffer Power Management")) for their own cards.
The question is whether their implementation can be ported to Xorg...
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
More information about the xorg