Thinking about migrating xorg/xserver from CVS to git

[Keith Packard]

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 23:39 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sunday 26 March 2006 23:19, Keith Packard wrote:
> > What I'd like to do is see what kind of schedule and process people
> > would like to have for a transition.
> >
> > Ajax has asked that we wait until after 7.1, which seems like a good
> > plan to me. I'd like to propose that we not wait a long time though;
> > there's no particular reason to keep 7.1 bug fixing in CVS, and it will
> > be easier to merge patches from HEAD to the 7.1 branch using git than
> > CVS.
> 
> These two sentences seem to contradict each other.

Sorry I was less than clear. I'd like to see 7.1 ship out of CVS and
then post-release bug fix versions be released on the 7.1 branch out of
git. Make sense that way?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060326/abddfa97/attachment.pgp>