LBX? or faster remote X?

[James Cloos]

>>>>> "Jeremy" == Jeremy C Reed <reed at reedmedia.net> writes:

Jeremy> I am curious why SSH protocol 2 doesn't use the CompressionLevel?

The rough consensus was that the difference in bandwith savings vs cpu/
ram savings wasn't enough to bother with anything other than level 6.

They may also have been some concerns with negotiation.

Further details should be available in the ietf-ssh archives at:

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/secsh/

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6